growled on Monday, September 18, 2006 7:19:18 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
barked at sports

You don't wanna get Rocky excited!

It's often said that the best defense is a good offense, but in yesterday's game between the Seahawks and the Cardinals, I would have to say the reverse is true. ;-) Just look at the game statistics and they tell a story...

Some of the stats look very comparable and might leave you wondering how the game ended up the way it did:

  • Kurt Warner had 231 passing yards versus Matt Hasslebeck's 221 and they each threw one touchdown.
  • Hasselbeck threw two interceptions compared to Warner's one.
  • Warner was sacked 5 times while Hasselbeck was sacked 3 [still too many though].
  • Arizona converted 6 of 14 3rd downs while Seattle converted 6 of 13.
  • The Cardinals had 11 penalties totalling 66 yards, but the Seahawks were penalized 7 times for 73 yards.

Meanwhile, looking at some more of the stats we begin to see the differences:

  • The Hawks' defense held the Cardinals' running game to only 65 yards, of which Edgerrin James had 64. The Hawks rushed for 146 which isn't a huge amount, but is 81 yards and two touchdowns more than Arizona. ;-)
  • Warner had 4 fumbles while Hasselbeck only had 1.
  • The Seahawks gained a total of 339 yards, but the Cardinals only gained 244 yards during almost equal time of possession (31:53 to 28:07).

I'm no football analyst, but the statistics tell me that the Hawks won through their running game. And by watching the game yesterday, I also know that the Hawks won because of the defense's constant pressure...on Warner, on their wide receivers, on Edgerrin James and basically anyone that stood a chance of getting the ball. The Cardinals just couldn't get into a rythym, period. They would make one good play and then our defensive line would cause them to screw up the next two forcing a punt. Their lack of rythym also left them unable to take advantage of the opportunities thrown their way. Two interceptions, five dropped passes by Seattle, a blocked field goal, a 14 yard punt...all were little things that Arizona could have used to turn the tide of the game, but they didn't. Next week against the N.Y. Giants (1-1) should be interesting...

~tod

tags: ,

Monday, September 18, 2006 12:38:31 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
I didn't get to see the game (apparently New Yorkers prefer watching the Jets and Giants to a Super Bowl team...idiots) so tell me this: did you see the same sort of troubles on the O-line (where Hutchinson used to be) that they had against Detroit? That scares me. That and how out-of-synch they must be with all the receivers coming and going.
Tuesday, September 19, 2006 7:29:42 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
CroutonBoy- New Yorkers...what are they thinking? ;-)

I thought the offensive line looked pretty good, much better than last week in Detroit. They were still a bit shaky at times (3 sacks...ugh), but I think they're getting there. After 2 'warm-up' games I think next week against New York will be a tell-tale sign. Honestly, Hasselbeck and the receivers didn't do to bad a job (especially Jackson). Burleson struggled a bit, but I think that with Jackson, Engram and (now) Branch we have a great trio of WRs to choose from at any given point.

I'm really looking forward to watching this Sunday's game...hopefully you'll get to watch it also!
Tuesday, September 19, 2006 11:04:55 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
Update: Looks like Floyd Womack (left guard) is out for 6 weeks (http://blogs.king5.com/seahawks/archives/2006/09/injury_report_w.html). Ouch!
Comments are closed.