growled on Monday, June 11, 2007 12:28:00 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
barked at technology

lifehacker has an article today, Organize your digital photos with Picasa, in which the author is enamored by the "ninja-like way Picasa helped me organize my photo collection." It's a semi-interesting read that raises some valid points/perspectives for how to keep track of your digital pix [1,000s in my case]. Although I'm comfortable with my methodology I always enjoy reading how others do it...maybe I'll catch a good tip or two. ;-)

Here's why Picasa is something I would stay away from:

Once you've copied or moved images around in folders within Picasa, do NOT tweak with them in Windows Explorer. I actually lost edits that I had made to two folders doing this.

That's a deal breaker for me. They've hooked you and are now just reeling you in. Ugh, now you're locked in to their app if you want all your organizational work to count for something going forward. No thanks!

I recently posted a how2 [find the date a picture was taken] that references this subject and the meaning behind my madness is this very subject...picture organization. I'm writing an app to rename all of my digital pictures based on a few select EXIF properties to keep things more organized. I'll have more on this in the near [I hope] future.

Meanwhile, an alternative to Picasa is Windows Photo Gallery, which comes with Windows Vista. Photo Gallery allows you to tag photos while importing them from your camera, make edits such as remove red-eye and cropping, and share them with family/friends. An especially nice feature, in my opinion, is that it "preserves the original 'digital negative,' so even after you edit the picture and save it, you can return it to its original form." Nice. :-)

~tod

tags: ,

Monday, June 18, 2007 9:52:36 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
An especially nice feature, in my opinion, is that it "preserves the original 'digital negative,' so even after you edit the picture and save it, you can return it to its original form."


This has always been the cool thing about Picasa, long before Vista! Your edits aren't applied to the original image. Instead, each folder has a picasa.ini folder that contains the changes which are applied on-the-fly. Next time you browse, it reconstructs the edits (or reads from cache if available). I'm guessing that lifehacker's problem was moving images into a new folder outside of Picasa. Obviously the associated data can't move automatically. On the other hand, you can apply changes in Picasa, but of course it change the original then. Every feature that you mention for Vista's gallery is in Picasa. I use both and prefer Picasa personally. Big differences in style though. YMMV.
Tuesday, June 19, 2007 2:37:10 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)
@Adrian- Thanks for the explanation. Since I don't use Picasa, I appreciate your first hand experience. I wonder how Vista's Photo Gallery maintains the negative....

A quick search yields the Microsoft PhotoBlog with this post, Editing Photos in Vista. In the post, John Thornton (a MSFT program manager), says "Vista keeps a backup of the original so you can always go back to the beginning. That is what the “Revert” button on the undo menu is all about." I'm not sure where the originals are stored, but I would rather have the full original archived than an .ini file tracking changes. Just my personal preference.
Comments are closed.